Website Heading


Another “Best Practices” May Not Be Best After All

For years, I’ve been critical of governance experts who promote “best practices” without any basis that these practices are actually effective, much less the best.  For example, the Harvard Law School’s Shareholder Rights Project undertook to push numerous companies to eliminate their staggered boards.  Two former SEC Commissioners took the Harvard SRP to task for advancing shareholder…

Share on:

Did The Harvard Shareholder Rights Project Prove Itself Wrong?

In December 2014, Stanford Law School Professor Joseph A. Grundfest and Daniel M. Gallagher incited an academic titanomachy when they released a draft of an academic paper provocatively entitled “Did Harvard Violate Federal Securities Law?  The Campaign Against Classified Boards of Directors“.  In this case, “Harvard” was the Harvard Shareholder Rights Project which described itself as “a clinical program operating at…

Share on:

The Shareholder Rights Project: Advice And Representation

Professor (and former SEC Commissioner) Joseph A. Grundfest and incumbent SEC Commissioner Daniel M. Gallagher have certainly fomented a spirited donnybrook over the Shareholder Rights Project at Harvard.  As discussed in this post,  they recently released a paper concluding, among other things, that the SRP’s “failure accurately to describe the current state of the academic literature can be characterized as…

Share on:

Commissioner Gallagher Posits SEC Would Prevail Against Harvard University

Just this week, Commissioner Daniel M. Gallagher and former Commissioner Joseph A. Grundfest issued a draft of a paper that takes on the Harvard Shareholder Rights Project.  The Harvard SRP describes itself as “a clinical program operating at Harvard Law School and directed by Professor Lucian Bebchuk.”  From 2012 through 2014, the Harvard SRP focused on proposing…

Share on: