“Interim Final Temporary Rules”, Say What?

Visitors to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website will find a pull-down menu entitled “Regulation”.  One of the items on that menu has the oxymoronic title of “Interim Final Temporary Rules”.  How can a rule be both interim (meaning provisional or for an intervening time period) and final (meaning, coming at the end)?  The nomenclature makes no

Did The SEC Staff Bypass The APA In Issuing New And Revised Non-GAAP Financial Measure C&DIs?

Earlier this week, the staff of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued several new, and rewrote several existing, Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (“C&DIs”) relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures.  Recently, the SEC has been signaling that it intends to crack down on company disclosures of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.  While some are likely to welcome additional guidance

Do The Secretary Of State’s Criteria For Determining “Generally Recognized Presidential Candidates” Violate The APA?

Earlier this week, the California Secretary of State released his list of “generally recognized presidential candidates”.  These are the individual whose names will appear on California’s June 2016 primary ballot.  The Secretary of State listed 43 individuals from six political parties (American Independent, Democratic, Green, Libertarian, Peace & Freedom, and Republican).  It’s not too late to

Facing Legal Challenges, SEC Proposes To Reform Administrative Proceedings

As has been widely reported elsewhere, the Securities and Exchange Commission has been facing a spate of challenges to its administrative court.  It should come as no surprise then that the SEC recently announced a number of proposals to the rules of practice in that forum.  I have already submitted a comment letter on the

A Most Nescient Comment?

Capture2

Monday was the close of the comment period on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s proposed rules with respect to listing standards requiring recovery of erroneously paid incentive compensation. In addition to myself, several commenters pointed out that the proposed rules make no allowance for state law.  I noted a potential conflict with California Labor Code

Court Rules That The SEC Unlawfully Withheld Action Mandated By Congress

Last fall, I wrote about Oxfam America’s second lawsuit to force the Securities and Exchange Commission to adopt a resource extraction disclosure rule under Section 1504 of the Dodd-Frank Act.  Readers may recall that Congress ordered the SEC to adopt rules by April 17, 2011.  The SEC, however, missed that deadline by over a year and

SEC Is Sued Again For Doing Nothing

Yesterday, Broc Romanek wrote about a lawsuit filed earlier this week against the Securities and Exchange Commission due to its failure to respond to a petition asking the Commission to adopt political spending disclosure requirements. But must the Commission act on the petitions that are submitted to it?  Rule 192 of the Commission’s Rules of

Broad Coalition Delivers Blunt Rebuke To SEC Chairman

Last month, I wrote that the SEC’s about face in responding to the no-action letter request of Whole Foods Market, Inc. “clearly wasn’t the SEC’s finest hour.”  See SEC’s Rule 14a-8 Volte-Face Is Pointlessly Outré But It Does Have Real World Ramifications.  Several days later, a coalition of some 17 different organizations delivered a much less

Did The SEC Violate The Administrative Procedure Act?

Yesterday, Broc Romanek wrote about the joint dissent issued by Commissioners Daniel M. Gallagher and Michael S. Piwowar with respect to the Commission’s recent adoption of Regulation SBSR which requires regulatory reporting of security-based swap information and the public dissemination of security-based swap transaction, volume, and pricing information by registered security-based swap data repositories.  But when exactly

The California Implications Of Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass’n et al.  The case, if decided against the Department of Labor (Thomas E. Perez is the Secretary of Labor), will have a significant impact on all federal administrative agencies.  But what, if any, will be its impact on California state agencies?