Website Heading

CALIFORNIA CORPORATE & SECURITIES LAW

Closing the Barn Door . . .

Yesterday, I wrote about Section 413 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“DF Act”).  You can watch President Obama’s explanation of Wall Street reform here.  As a horse owner, I’m sensitive to expressions involving horses.  Thus, it occurs to me that in some ways the exclusion of an investor’s primary residence…

Share on:

People v. Cole – “So What Happens Now?”

Yesterday was the last day for comments on the Commissioner’s proposed rule to address the Court of Appeal’s holding in People v. Cole, 156 Cal. App. 4th 452 (2007).  I’ve seen that several persons have submitted comments in addition to myself – all addressing the exception for employees in the proposed rule. To reprise Evita…

Share on:

Can You Still Include Your Primary Residence in California?

With Congress’ passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “DF Act”), lawyers across the nation are struggling to come to grips with the act’s impact on their clients.  Lawyers representing businesses in need of capital, venture capital companies and hedge funds are noting that Section 413 of the act will…

Share on:

Section 307 – No More Sunset

Some readers may have noticed that there are currently two Section 307s in the Corporations Code.  One version of Section 307 provides in subdivision (d) that it remains in effect only until January 1, 2011.  This is commonly referred to as a “sunset provision”.   Subdivision (d) of the other Section 307 provides that it…

Share on:

DOC Employees to Receive Full Pay – For the Time Being

On July 6, 2010, I reported on a recent Court of Appeal decision that supported Governor Schwarzenegger’s attempt to reduce state employees’ salaries to the federal minimum wage.  The Court of Appeal’s holding did not require the Controller to reduce salaries.  Thus, the Governor went back to Superior Court.  As reported in this Sacramento Bee…

Share on:

Bay State Security Breach – Implications for the Golden State

Broc Romanek recently posted an item from Alan Parness concerning a security breakdown at the Massachusetts Securities Division.  Alan raises an excellent question about whether a state agency would be as forgiving of someone that it regulates. Privacy would seem to be a very important issue in California.  In fact, the very first article and…

Share on:

What You Can and Can’t Do in Sacramento

There are many fun things to do in Sacramento – have dinner at Frank Fats or visit the California State Railroad Museum.  The capitol building and the museum in the basement are worth visiting. However, if you do visit the capitol, you need to remember that certain activities are off limits.  In fact, the California…

Share on:

ICC – Requiescat in Pacem

The Interstate Commerce Commission was created in 1887 when Grover Cleveland was president.  Over the years, Congress greatly expanded the ICC’s authority.  At one time, the ICC had thousands of employees.  In 1995, President Clinton signed legislation abolishing the ICC and it has disappeared from the regulatory scene.  Strangely, however, the ICC lives on in…

Share on:

CalPERS and the DDD

A few weeks ago, The Wall Street Journal reported that California’s largest public pension plan is planning to create a database of directors, which is being referred to as the “Diverse Director Database” or DDD.  Interestingly, a director registry has been part of the Corporations Code for 17 years. In 1993, former Senator Lucy Killea…

Share on:

It Really Isn’t Too Late

As noted in yesterday’s post, the deadline for comments on the Commissioner of Corporation’s proposal to adopt a rule to address the Court of Appeal’s holding in People v. Cole, 156 Cal. App. 4th 452 (2007) was yesterday.  Yesterday, however, the Commissioner extended the comment period until July 20, 2010.  The opportunity for comment is…

Share on: