<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for California Corporate &amp; Securities Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://CALCORPORATELAW.COM/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://CALCORPORATELAW.COM</link>
	<description>California Corporate and Securities Law Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SEC Argues That Sales Of Hotel Rooms Are Sales of A Security by mgfind.com &#124; Blog &#124; When is &#60;b&#62;Real Estate&#60;/b&#62; a Security? &#124; Compliance Building</title>
		<link>http://CALCORPORATELAW.COM/2011/08/sec-argues-that-sales-of-hotel-rooms-are-sales-of-a-security/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>mgfind.com &#124; Blog &#124; When is &#60;b&#62;Real Estate&#60;/b&#62; a Security? &#124; Compliance Building</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calcorporatelaw.com/?p=6114#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...] SEC Argues That Sales of Hotel Rooms Are Sales of a Security by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate and Securities Law [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SEC Argues That Sales of Hotel Rooms Are Sales of a Security by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate and Securities Law [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CalPERS&#8217; Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get? by CalPERS Responds &#171; California Corporate &#38; Securities Law</title>
		<link>http://CALCORPORATELAW.COM/2011/06/calpers-annus-horribilis-how-much-worse-will-it-get/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>CalPERS Responds &#171; California Corporate &#38; Securities Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calcorporatelaw.com/?p=5200#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] this week, I wrote about the many scandals that have been swirling about the California Public Employees Retirement [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this week, I wrote about the many scandals that have been swirling about the California Public Employees Retirement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If I Were A Carpenter, I&#8217;d Build A Better Proxy by CorpGov.net &#187; Support Carpenters Petition SEC to Eliminate Withhold Authority</title>
		<link>http://CALCORPORATELAW.COM/2011/05/if-i-were-a-carpenter-id-build-a-better-proxy/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>CorpGov.net &#187; Support Carpenters Petition SEC to Eliminate Withhold Authority</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calcorporatelaw.com/?p=5016#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules by Felons and Fund Managers &#124; Compliance Building</title>
		<link>http://CALCORPORATELAW.COM/2011/05/sec-proposes-john-wilkes-booth-rule/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Felons and Fund Managers &#124; Compliance Building</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 12:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calcorporatelaw.com/?p=5003#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate &amp; Securities Law [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate &amp; Securities Law [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now) by OPISO &#187; Top 5 Corporate &#38; Securities Blog Posts This Week</title>
		<link>http://CALCORPORATELAW.COM/2011/05/conflict-minerals-bill-in-suspense-file-for-now/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>OPISO &#187; Top 5 Corporate &#38; Securities Blog Posts This Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 15:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calcorporatelaw.com/?p=4925#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] California Corporate &amp; Securities Law Blog: Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now) &#8211; In this post, Keith Paul Bishop discusses the uncertain future of the Dodd-Frank mandate [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] California Corporate &amp; Securities Law Blog: Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now) &#8211; In this post, Keith Paul Bishop discusses the uncertain future of the Dodd-Frank mandate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now) by Securities Law Practice Center - PLI &#8211; Top 5 Corporate &#38; Securities Blog Posts This Week</title>
		<link>http://CALCORPORATELAW.COM/2011/05/conflict-minerals-bill-in-suspense-file-for-now/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Securities Law Practice Center - PLI &#8211; Top 5 Corporate &#38; Securities Blog Posts This Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 13:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calcorporatelaw.com/?p=4925#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] California Corporate &amp; Securities Law Blog: Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now) &#8211; In this post, Keith Paul Bishop discusses the uncertain future of the Dodd-Frank mandate [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] California Corporate &amp; Securities Law Blog: Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now) &#8211; In this post, Keith Paul Bishop discusses the uncertain future of the Dodd-Frank mandate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof by &#8220;Fair Is Foul, And Foul Is Fair&#8221;, But Are &#8220;Fair Value&#8221; And &#8220;Fair Market Value&#8221; Synonymous? &#171; California Corporate &#38; Securities Law</title>
		<link>http://CALCORPORATELAW.COM/2011/05/nevada-supreme-court-adopts-delaware-approach-to-fair-value-burden-of-proof/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Fair Is Foul, And Foul Is Fair&#8221;, But Are &#8220;Fair Value&#8221; And &#8220;Fair Market Value&#8221; Synonymous? &#171; California Corporate &#38; Securities Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 09:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calcorporatelaw.com/?p=4867#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] Friday, I wrote in this post about a recent Nevada Supreme Court decision that provides a modicum of guidance on how &#8220;fair [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friday, I wrote in this post about a recent Nevada Supreme Court decision that provides a modicum of guidance on how &#8220;fair [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions by Child Custody Act &#124; We Wish To Adopt</title>
		<link>http://CALCORPORATELAW.COM/2011/05/concurrent-jurisdiction-found-for-covered-class-actions/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Child Custody Act &#124; We Wish To Adopt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 01:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calcorporatelaw.com/?p=4845#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) is a Uniform Act drafted in 1997, and adopted by the majority of [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) is a Uniform Act drafted in 1997, and adopted by the majority of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

