Website Heading

CALIFORNIA CORPORATE & SECURITIES LAW

Nevada Now Requiring Director Names Upon Incorporation

Until this month, incorporators of Nevada corporations were required to file an initial list of its officers and directors on or before the last day of the first month after filing the initial articles of incorporation (unless the corporation selected an alternative due date (See NRS 78.150 & NAC 78.300 – .380)).  Reportedly, many incorporators failed to file…

Share on:

Delaware Special Litigation Committee Review “Could Stand A Good Tweaking”

UCLA Law School Professor Stephen Bainbridge recently critiqued the Nevada Supreme Court’s decision to follow Auerbach v. Bennett, 419 N.Y.S.2d 920 (1979) rather than Delaware’s Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado, 430 A.2d 779 (Del. 1981).  He concludes: To be sure, Delaware law in this area could stand a good tweaking. The Aronson/Zapata framework continues to rely unduly on…

Share on:

How To Win Custody Of A Corporation

In family law, the fights are often over who gets custody of the kids, the pets and the house.  Shareholders battle over many things, but you don’t often hear of custody fights in the corporate context.  Is it even possible to win custody of a corporation?  In Nevada, the answer is yes. NRS 78.347 allows any stockholder to apply to…

Share on:

Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware’s Direct Harm Test For Derivative Claims

On the same day that the Nevada Supreme Court rejected Delaware’s approach to reviewing special litigation committee determinations, it adopted Delaware’s test for determining whether a shareholder suit is derivative or direct.  Parametric Sound Corp. v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 59 (2017).  When shareholders sue officers and directors, they may pursue direct…

Share on:

Review Of Special Litigation Committee Recommendations

Yesterday’s post limned the Nevada Supreme Court’s adoption of New York’s Auerbach standard of review for special litigation committee recommendations.  In re Dish Network Derivative Litigation, 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 61 (2017).  The Supreme Court unequivocally required that the trial court apply Auerbach at an evidentiary hearing : Pursuant to Auerbach, 393 N.E.2d at 996, and consistent with…

Share on:

Nevada Favors New York Over Delaware Precedent For SLC Review

Nevada law endows a board of directors “full control over the affairs of the corporation”.  NRS 78.120(1).  This control is subject only to such limitations as may be provided by NRS chapter 7, or the articles of incorporation of the corporation.  Id.  This means the board controls decisions about whether the corporation should bring suit.  The ability…

Share on:

Nevada Precedes Delaware In Blockchain Legislation

On July 21, 2017, Delaware’s 74th Governor, John Carney, signed SB 69 into law.  This legislation amended various provisions of Delaware’s General Corporation Law (Title 8, Delaware Code) ostensibly to establish express statutory authority for Delaware corporations to use networks of electronic databases for the creation and maintenance of corporate records, including the stock ledger.  These databases are…

Share on:

Suing The CEO For Social Activism Is Likely To Be Challenging Under Nevada Law

Yesterday’s post concerned asked the question whether shareholders can sue CEOs for social activism.  The answer is of course, yes.  The more interesting question is whether shareholders will win the suit.  To answer that question, one must first decide on what law applies.  Although many may assume that the law of the state of incorporation should govern,…

Share on:

Does Disclosure Of Results Of Internal Investigation Constitute Subject Matter Waiver?

Last Friday, I wrote about one of the docketed appeals in Wynn Resorts, Limited v. Eight Jud. Dist. Ct., 41 Nev. Adv. Op. 52 (2017).  Today’s post concerns the other docketed appeal in that case.  This appeal addressed whether disclosure of an internal investigation results in a waiver of the attorney-client privilege.  To recap, the case…

Share on:

Does Assertion Of Business Judgment Rule Waive Attorney-Client Privilege?

Nevada, like California, has codified the attorney-client privilege: A client has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent any other person from disclosing, confidential communications: Between the client or the client’s representative and the client’s lawyer or the representative of the client’s lawyer Between the client’s lawyer and the lawyer’s representative. Made for…

Share on: