NASAA Mistakes The Principal

I have frequently commented on the fact that many so-called “investor protections” have the unintended consequence of increasing the risk of investor losses.  One example is limitations on resales.  An illiquid security presents greater risk than a liquid security.  Investors understand this and will apply an illiquidity discount to the price of a security.  In this

Just When Does That Law Take Effect?

The California legislature sits in a two-year session known as a biennium.  The current session is the 2015-2016 session.  The first year of the session ended on September 11, 2015.  That was the last day for the legislature to pass bills.  Joint Rule 61(a)(14). The legislature’s passage of a bill does not necessarily mean that

California Enacts Change-in-Control Benefits For Grocery Workers

Last week, Governor Jerry Brown signed AB 359 (Gonzalez) that will impose a worker retention requirement when there has been a change in ownership or control of grocery establishments.  In general, the bill will require the successor grocery employer to retain eligible grocery workers for a 90-day period.  After that period expires, the successor grocery employer will

California Amends Code To Authorize Worker Cooperatives

I’ve written in the past about various efforts to create a workers cooperative law here in California.  See Are Worker Cooperatives A “Sea Water Fish In A Freshwater Pond”? and In The Year 2525, If Man Is Still Alive, If Woman Can Survive, They May Find Limited Liability Worker Cooperatives.  This summer, the California legislature enacted legislation, AB

California Reverts To Former Securities Anti-Fraud Statute

Readers of this blog will recall my chariness of a 2013 amendment to California’s basic securities anti-fraud statute.  See California Creates Complete Chaos By Rewriting Anti-Fraud Statute, But “We Are Against Fraud Aren’t We?”  Although I identified a host of issues, my fundamental concern was that by rewriting California Corporations Code Section 25401, the legislature

Senate Appropriations Committee Is Next Stop For California Finders Bill

AB 667 (Wagner) continues to wend its way through the California legislature.  The bill, which was sponsored by the Corporations Committee of the Business Law Section of the California State Bar, defines a finder as a natural person who, for direct or indirect compensation, introduces or refers one or more accredited investors, as that term

Uniform Voidable Transactions Act Becomes Law (Almost)

On June 2, 1897, the New York Journal famously quoted Samuel Clemens (aka Mark Twain) as saying “The report of my death was an exaggeration”.   This widely quoted (and misquoted) denial was a riposte to a story that appeared the day before in the New York Herald about the author’s imminent demise.  I had a similar

Could This Really Be The Origin Of Due Process?

On Monday, I wrote about the upcoming 800th anniversary of the Magna Carta.  The California Assembly recently took note of the upcoming octocentennial and is considering adoption of a commemorative concurrent resolution.  The resolution, ACR 76, provides a fairly accurate description of the historical events and key clauses of the Magna Carta.  However, I do

Assembly Committee Seeks To Fix Securities Fraud Statute

Readers of this blog will be familiar with my criticism of the 2013 amendment of California’s basic securities fraud statute, Corporations Code Section 25401.  See California Creates Complete Chaos By Rewriting Anti-Fraud Statute, But “We Are Against Fraud Aren’t We?”, Die Verwandlung: How The Legislature Likely Raised The Bar On Securities Fraud Actions, When California Copied Rule

I understand Chair, Chairperson, Chairman and Chairwoman But Not Chairwomen of the Board

In February, I posted this little rumination on the origin of the term “chairman”.  Then I came across SB 351 introduced late last month by the California Senate Committee on Banking and Financial Institutions.  Currently, Sections 5213, 7213 and 9213 of the California Corporations Code each provides that a corporation must have “a chair of the