Website Heading

CALIFORNIA CORPORATE & SECURITIES LAW

Court Rejects Challenge To Internal Affairs Doctrine

Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. is a publicly traded company that is incorporated in Bermuda.  Marvell’s U.S. operating subsidiary is based in California.  A year ago, an institutional stockholder filed a derivative suit against Marvell and several of its officers and directors.  The factual bases for the plaintiff’s suit were securities law violations but the plaintiff…

Share on:

More Silliness In California’s Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act

Readers will know that I have been a frequent critic of California’s Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act, Cal. Corp. Code § 17701.01 et seq. In many cases, it is simply hard to believe that the legislature really intended what it enacted. See, e.g., How Confused Is This? California Defines LLCs Subject To New Law To Include…

Share on:

New California Law Threatens To Destroy Plan Uniformity

Companies often include a choice of law provision in their equity and other compensation plans.  Some companies include a choice of law  in the award agreement, either in lieu of, or in addition to, the plan document.  Specifying applicable law helps to ensure that plans are consistently interpreted and applied.  Uniformity may be particularly important…

Share on:

Ouch! Proxy Statement Argues That Resolving Dispute In California Court Was “Costly And Time Consuming”

As Ralph Waldo Emerson once famously told Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.: ““Holmes, when you strike at a king, you must kill him.”  For the full story, see The Corporations Code Can Make Suing Your Former Employees Costly.  I was reminded of this advice when reading the following in the proxy statement of a California-based company in favor…

Share on:

Which Code Applies When A Stock Certificate Has Been Lost, Destroyed Or Wrongfully Taken?

Earlier this week, I wrote about Judge Edward M. Chen’s ruling in Sender v. Franklin Res., Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171453, 3-4 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2015).  Judge Chen applied California Corporations Code Section 419 to a Delaware corporation on the basis that the replacement of a lost or stolen stock certificate was not governed…

Share on:

Replacement Of Lost Stock Certificate Is Not An Internal Affair, But So What?

U.S. District Court Judge Edward M. Chen recently ruled that a stockholder could maintain an action under California Corporations Code Section 419 for replacement of a lost, stolen or destroyed certificate.  As just described, the ruling shouldn’t be a surprise.  Section 419 provides that if “a corporation refuses to issue a new share certificate or other certificate in…

Share on:

Which Comes First, Rescission Or Choice Of Forum?

A recent ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Arthur D. Spatt raises the interesting question of whether a choice of law provision can be vitiated by rescission.  The case, Hatteras Enterprises, Inc. v. Forsythe Cosmetic Group, Ltd., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100352 (July 30, 2016), involved six separate agreements, each containing a New York choice of law…

Share on:

What Law Governs A Foreign General Partnership?

The California Uniform Partnership Act of 1994 defines a “partnership” to mean “an association of two or more persons to carry on as coowners a business for profit formed under [Cal. Corp. Code] Section 16202, predecessor law, or comparable law of another jurisdiction . . .”.  Cal. Corp. Code § 16101(9).  The California act does not define…

Share on:

Three Questions To Ask Before Incorporating In Delaware

In the business world it was once commonly said that “no one ever was fired for buying IBM”.  Given Delaware’s preeminent market share, the same thinking may underlie a recommendation to incorporate there.  Before making that recommendation, I encourage you to consider the following three questions: Does the corporation want to pay a lot more money in…

Share on:

What Does Americold Realty Trust Have To Do With Rule 147?

Under Article III, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, the judicial power of the federal courts may extend to, among other things, controversies between citizens of different states.  When a party is a trust, in what state is the trust a citizen for purposes of the diversity jurisdiction of the federal courts?  There are several…

Share on: