Website Heading

CALIFORNIA CORPORATE & SECURITIES LAW

Does Placing Non-GAAP Financial Measures First Violate The Law?

Yesterday’s post discussed the SEC staff’s recently announced position that Item 10(e)(1)(A) of Regulation S-K requires that issuers disclose comparable GAAP financial measures before non-GAAP financial measures. Item 10(e)(1)(A) requires only that issuers afford GAAP financial measures “equal or greater prominence” as non-GAAP measures.  What then is the legal significance of the staff’s position that GAAP…

Share on:

When The SEC Became A Real Estate Regulator

For at least a century, it has been said that only three things matter in real estate: location, location, location.  Recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission took this old saw to heart in the context of disclosure of non-GAAP financial measures.  The SEC’s fixation on location began this past May when the staff updated its Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations…

Share on:

“Tandy Letter” Requests – RIP

Broc Romanek reported yesterday that the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission will no longer require “Tandy Letter” disclaimers in responses to staff comments.   Among other things, the Tandy Letter policy required a company to state affirmatively that it would not raise the SEC review process and acceleration of effectiveness as a defense in any legal proceeding. …

Share on:

Will California Public Pension Systems Go Underground In Implementing New Disclosure Law?

Writing in the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, Catherine Skulan and  Raj Marphatia provide an interesting overview of California’s recently enacted alternative investment vehicle fee disclosure law, AB 2833.  This law requires public pension and retirement systems to require alternative investment vehicles, as defined, to make specified disclosures regarding fees, expenses, and…

Share on:

Chevron Deference In California

In mid July, the House of Representatives passed the Separation of Powers Restoration Act of 2016, H.R. 4768 (SOPRA).  If enacted, the SOPRA would amend the federal Administrative Procedure Act to require a reviewing court to decide “de novo all relevant questions of law, including the interpretation of constitutional and  statutory provisions, and rules made by agencies”.   The…

Share on:

Has The California State Treasurer’s Office Gone Underground?

Late last month, the California State Treasurer’s Office announced a “move to stop ‘Pay-to-Play’ school bond campaigns”.  According to the announcement: [M]unicipal finance firms seeking state business will be required to certify that they make no contributions to bond election campaigns. Firms that fail to do so will be removed from the state’s official list…

Share on:

Giving A Hand To Mandamus

“Mandamus” is the first person plural present indicative active form of the Latin word meaning to command.  It is most likely the result of combining the Latin word for “hand”, manus, with the Latin word “to give”, do.  Some readers may be familiar with the religious holiday with the unusual name of Maundy Thursday.  The word “maundy” is…

Share on:

“Interim Final Temporary Rules”, Say What?

Visitors to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website will find a pull-down menu entitled “Regulation”.  One of the items on that menu has the oxymoronic title of “Interim Final Temporary Rules”.  How can a rule be both interim (meaning provisional or for an intervening time period) and final (meaning, coming at the end)?  The nomenclature makes no…

Share on:

SEC Declines To Define “Mineral” In Resource Extraction Rule But Then Defines It Anyway

As reported by Broc Romanek yesterday, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted (again) a resource extraction rule.  Congress had ordered the SEC to adopt a rule by April 17, 2011.  After belatedly adopting a rule, the U.S. District Court vacated the rule and sent it back to the SEC.  American Petroleum Institute v. SEC, 953…

Share on:

Clock Winds Down On Resource Extraction Disclosure Rule

Congress told the SEC to adopt a resource extraction disclosure rule by no later than April 17, 2011.  The SEC missed that statutory deadline by over a year.  After the SEC belatedly adopted a rule in 2012, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia vacated it and sent it back to the SEC. …

Share on: