Website Heading

CALIFORNIA CORPORATE & SECURITIES LAW

Insider Trading, Newman And Der Prozess

The U.S. Supreme Court’s denial of review in U.S. v. Newman, 773 F.3d 438 (2014) yesterday inspired the following very short tale:

Joseph K. knew that he had done nothing wrong, but, one morning, he was arrested.  Joseph K. asked the officer “why have I been arrested?”  The officer replied “insider trading”.  “What statute is that?” asked Joseph K.  The officer responded “No statute precisely defines the offense”.  “Surely then, there must be a regulation” posited Joseph K.  “There is no such regulation” answered the officer.  Though annoyed by Joseph K.’s insistence on knowing exactly why he had been arrested, the officer explained: “You see, the offense is based on theories – two theories to be precise.  It is only when the courts convict people of insider trading that they reveal the theories under which they have been convicted.  It’s been done this way for quite some time, just ask Mr. O’Hagan.”  Joseph K. now knew what the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals already knew: “Absent clearly defined rules, investors find themselves the targets of ad hoc decisionmaking or pawns in an overall litigation strategy known only to the SEC.”  United States v. Bryan, 58 F.3d 933, 951 (4th Cir. 1995)

For more on the Supreme Court’s decision, see Professor Stephen Bainbridge’s post: Supreme Court denies cert in US v. Newman insider trading tipping case.

Franz_Kafka_from_National_Library_Israel

Share on:

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY

We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.

CONTACT US

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!