Website Heading


SEC Shamelessly Targets Late Filers

Yesterday, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced “charges” against 28 officers, directors, or major shareholders for failing to report timely ownership and transactions as required by Section 16(a) and Section 13 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.  These individuals were ordered pay thousands of dollars in fines and to cease and desist from future violations.  The SEC also charged six companies for contributing to these delinquent filings.  With no hint of irony, the announcement warned:

The reporting requirements in the federal securities laws are not mere suggestions, they are legal obligations that must be obeyed.

Apparently, the SEC believes that this principle does not apply to itself.  The Dodd-Frank Act is a federal securities law that imposed numerous deadlines on the SEC.  These deadlines were not “mere suggestions”, they were legal obligations that the SEC was required to obey.  Yet, the SEC did not.  For example, the SEC failed to adopt resource extraction rules within the statutorily mandated 270 days.  After the SEC missed this deadline by over a year, Oxfam America filed suit to force the SEC to comply.  See Waiting for the SEC . . . and Supreme Court Fails To Bite At Bulldog And Oxfam America Sues The SEC.  Eventually, the SEC adopted final rules on August 22, 2012 – only 600 days late!  Yet, no cease and desist orders were issued and no fines were assessed against the Commissioners.  This was not an isolated example of tardiness.  According to this report, the SEC has missed over 30% of the rule making deadlines imposed by the Dodd-Frank Act.  Perhaps Congress should change the SEC’s name to “Securities and Exchange Cunctator”.

While I may not like many of the rules that Congress ordered the SEC to adopt, the SEC’s failure to comply with the law is consequential.  Allowing an agency to violate the law with impunity gives the agency a veto power over Congress.  When any agency violates the law, the agency forfeits the moral authority to enforce the law.  There should not be one law for the regulated and no law for the regulator.

Share on:


We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.


Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

Related Articles