• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

New Law Aims To Make It Easier To Levy On Bank Accounts

By Keith Paul Bishop on January 4, 2013 in Financial Institutions

Last year, the Consumer Financial Services Committee of the Business Law Section of the California State Bar sponsored AB 2364 (Wagner).  This bill, which took effect on Tuesday, is intended to simplify the process for levying on bank accounts for both creditors and banks. 

Until now, a creditor was required to identify and serve separately each branch of a bank at which the debtor maintained an account to reach all of those deposits.  Finding the right branch bank for service of levies, attachments and garnishments was not always easy and could be costly.  Moreover, the debtor could frustrate these efforts by moving the money around.  Despite these shortcomings, the rule was not without a reason.  In the pre-digital age, bank records were kept at the branch level.  I can remember when my bank would look up my account information on cards.  This local record-keeping made it difficult for banks to identify all accounts of a particular customer.

AB 2364 changes all of this by requiring bank or financial institution with more than nine branch offices within California to designate one or more branches or offices for service of legal process within the state.  These are referred to as “central locations”.  Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 684.115(a).   Banks with fewer than nine branches may also make a designation if they choose.  

Last year, the Department of Financial Institutions sent emails to to its licensees with a link to a secure site on which the designation could be input.  The DFI hopes to have the designations posted on its Web site by January 15, 2013.  If a financial institution fails to make a designation of central location(s), then each branch of that institution located in California is deemed to be a central location at which service of legal process may be made, and all of the institution’s branches or offices located within California are deemed to be a branch or office covered by central process.  Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 684.115(b).  From the perspective of the financial institution, the designation of one or more central locations may help to reduce errors by branch staff through centralizing or concentrating these functions.

AB 2364Consumer Financial Services CommitteeDFIlevying on bank accountsSEction 684.115(b)
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • If You’re Relying On The Signature Of Two Officers, You May Want To Think Again
  • Court Explicates Scope of Usury Exemption For Real Estate Brokers
  • Supreme Court To Decide If It Will Decide Whether Section 16 Plaintiff Has Constitutional Standing
  • But Wait, California May Require Even More In Annual Reports To Shareholders
  • California Requires Many Foreign Corporations To Send Annual Financial Statements To Shareholders
  • The Salon Sub Rosa And Nevada Corporate Law
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • JOBS Act
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

January 2013
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Copyright © 2013 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me