• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

California’s GO-Biz Site Bedeviled By Errors and Omissions

By Keith Paul Bishop on January 2, 2013 in Investment Advisers, Non-Compete Agreements, Securities Litigation

According to the website, the California Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz) was created ”to serve as California’s single point of contact for economic development and job creation efforts”.  While the site does provide some very basic level of information, it is dangerously incomplete and riddled with manifest errors.  No advice would be better than bad advice.

“It Sounds Funny I Know, But It Really Is So, Oh, I’m My Own Grandpa”

For example, the website includes a page on “Defining a Business” which includes links to various types of business entities, including corporations.  The link to corporations, provides brief information on “registering” domestic corporations, nonprofit corporations, and foreign corporations.  The description of domestic corporation “registration” is as follows:

Domestic stock companies must complete the Articles of Incorporation and pay a fee to the Secretary of State.  There are three versions of the Articles of Incorporation: general stock corporation, professional corporation and close corporation.

The first statement is technically impossible, a corporation can’t complete its own articles of incorporation because it doesn’t exist until the articles are filed with the Secretary of State’s office.  Cal. Corp. Code § 200(c).  In fact, one or more incorporators must execute and file the articles of incorporation.  Cal. Corp. Code § 200(a).

The second sentence is also not correct.  California law permits the articles of incorporation to include a wide range of optional provisions beyond the limited number of required provisions (i.e., the name, applicable statement of purpose, initial agent for service or process, and capital structure). Cal. Corp. Code §§ 202 & 204.  Thus, there are a huge number of possible versions of articles of incorporation for corporations organized under the General Corporation Law.  Even if the intended meaning was that there are three types of corporations, that assertion would be equally incorrect.  For example, California permits the formation of both flexible purpose and benefit corporations.  See California’s Two New Corporate Forms – And The Winner Is . . .

 Corporations are Persons, But Not People

Similar errors abound in the information provided with respect to limited partnerships, which begins with this misstatement: “[l]imited partnerships are formed by two or more people . . .” (emphasis added).  Under the Uniform Limited Partnership Act of 2008, a limited partnership is defined as an entity which is formed “by two or more persons“.  Cal. Corp. Code § 15901.02(q).  ”Persons” may be people but not all persons are people.  The Act defines a “person” to mean an “individual, partnership, limited partnership, trust, estate association, corporation, limited liability company, or other entity, whether domestic or foreign”.  Cal. Corp. Code § 15901.02(y).

No Blue Skies Will Be Smiling At Me

As a former securities regulator, perhaps the most alarming omission is the complete absence of any mention of the securities laws or even the Department of Corporations.  Any layperson viewing this site would have no clue that they simply couldn’t sell securities to anyone and in any manner they wish.

New Law Requires More Nonprofit Disclosure on GO-Biz Website

 Last year, the legislature enacted AB 2641 (Skinner) requiring the GO-Biz website to provide additional specific information on formation of nonprofit corporations.  Let’s hope that the information provided is more complete an accurate than what is currently available.

AB 2641General Corporation LawGO-BizGovernor's office of business and economic developmentLimited Partnership Act of 2008Section 200(a)Section 200(c)Section 202Section 204
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • If You’re Relying On The Signature Of Two Officers, You May Want To Think Again
  • Court Explicates Scope of Usury Exemption For Real Estate Brokers
  • Supreme Court To Decide If It Will Decide Whether Section 16 Plaintiff Has Constitutional Standing
  • But Wait, California May Require Even More In Annual Reports To Shareholders
  • California Requires Many Foreign Corporations To Send Annual Financial Statements To Shareholders
  • The Salon Sub Rosa And Nevada Corporate Law
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • JOBS Act
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

January 2013
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Copyright © 2013 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me