• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

A Corporate Governance Lesson From Pericles

By Keith Paul Bishop on January 22, 2013 in Corporate Governance

Before shareholders may take action at a meeting, a quorum must be established.  See When The Best Offensive Strategy May Simply Be To Stay Home.  The existence of a quorum does not guaranty that action has been validly taken at a shareholders’ meeting because the meeting must also have been properly noticed.  Cal. Corp. Code § 601(a). However, a quorum and proper notice may not be enough.  If the shareholders’ meeting was a special meeting, then it must have been properly called.  Pursuant to Corporations Code Section 600(d), special meetings may be called by the board, the chairperson of the board, the president, the holders of shares entitled to cast not less than 10 percent of the votes at the meeting, or any additional persons as may be provided in the articles or bylaws.

The great Athenian statesman, Pericles, knew the importance of being able to control the call of a meeting.  In the fifth century B.C.E., war erupted between the democratic city-state of Athens and the diarchy of Sparta.  The Athenian leader Pericles convinced Athens to adopt a “rope-a-dope” strategy in which the Spartans were allowed to pillage Attica (the region around Athens) without facing any serious opposition from the Athenian army.  It is a testament to Pericles’ leadership that he was able to convince the Athenians to stay within the city walls and watch the pillaging of their fields and orchards.  Pericles, however, didn’t just rely on his powers of persuasion – he knew the power of the call:

Περικλῆς δὲ ὁρῶν μὲν αὐτοὺς πρὸς τὸ παρὸν χαλεπαίνοντας καὶ οὐ τὰ ἄριστα φρονοῦντας, πιστεύων δὲ ὀρθῶς γιγνώσκειν περὶ τοῦ μὴ ἐπεξιέναι, ἐκκλησίαν τε οὐκ ἐποίει αὐτῶν οὐδὲ ξύλλογον οὐδένα, τοῦ μὴ ὀργῇ τι μᾶλλον ἢ γνώμῃ ξυνελθόντας ἐξαμαρτεῖν . . . .  (Pericles, seeing the [Athenians] being grievously wounded by their present affairs and not thinking their best, thought it right to not go out against the enemy nor to call an assembly or single meeting lest being brought together, the Athenians err by their impulse and not their best thinking).

Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, Book 2, chapter 22. See also Plutarch, Pericles, Chapter 33, section 5 (“τὸν δὲ δῆμον εἰς ἐκκλησίαν οὐ συνῆγε δεδιὼς βιασθῆναι παρὰ γνώμην” (he [Pericles] did not call together an assembly fearing that he would be constrained in his judgment)).

Thus, Pericles’ lesson is that in some circumstances, the power to call (or refrain from calling) a meeting can be critical.   Had Pericles called an assembly, it is entirely possible that the Athenians would have voted to march out against the Spartan heavy infantry and been defeated.  Undoubtedly, the history of western civilization and literature would have been far different, such is the power of the call.

call of special meetingPericlesplutarchSection 601(a)Thucydides
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • If You’re Relying On The Signature Of Two Officers, You May Want To Think Again
  • Court Explicates Scope of Usury Exemption For Real Estate Brokers
  • Supreme Court To Decide If It Will Decide Whether Section 16 Plaintiff Has Constitutional Standing
  • But Wait, California May Require Even More In Annual Reports To Shareholders
  • California Requires Many Foreign Corporations To Send Annual Financial Statements To Shareholders
  • The Salon Sub Rosa And Nevada Corporate Law
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • JOBS Act
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

January 2013
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Copyright © 2013 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me