• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

Lincoln (The Movie) Overlooks Nevada

By Keith Paul Bishop on November 23, 2012 in Nevada Corporations

Steven Spielberg’s new film, Lincoln, focuses not on the assassination of the President or the end of the Civil War, but on Congress’ passage of the Thirteenth Amendment. The film depicts President Lincoln as a skilled, but not overly scrupulous, politician dedicated as much to ending slavery as to ending the war.  According to the film, Lincoln’s success is not the result of his oratory or skills of persuasion, but of his willingness to countenance and even encourage bribery.  I was disappointed that the film did not mention the critical role of Nevada in these events.

In early 1864, President Lincoln was looking for additional electoral votes for his reelection as well as votes in Congress to approve the Thirteenth Amendment.  On March 24, 1864, he signed the Nevada statehood bill and a constitutional convention was convened on July 4.  Act of March 21, 1864, ch. 36, 13 Stat. 30 (1864).  Less than one month later, Nevada’s constitution was completed and approved by the people of the territory.  Nevada was so sparsely populated that the number of people voting for acceptance (less than 12,000) was fewer than the number of words in the constitution (nearly 18,000).  The President needed the new state to be admitted posthaste and so the entire constitution was delivered by telegram to Washington D.C.  On October 31, 1864, President Lincoln proclaimed the admission of Nevada as this country’s thirty-sixth state.  On November 8, 1864, the people of Nevada voted in the presidential election.  President Lincoln, as expected, won Nevada with 59.8% of the vote (he lost to George B. McClellan in Delaware).  On January 31, 1865, Nevada’s new Congressman, H.G. Worthington, voted with 118 other members of the House of Representatives to approve the Thirteenth Amendment.  Below is a description of the event:

The announcement was received by the House and the spectators with an outburst of enthusiasm.  The members on the Republican side of the House instantly sprung to their feet, and, regardless of parliamentary rules, applauded with cheers and clapping of hands.  The example was followed by the male spectators in the galleries, which were crowded to excess, who waived their hats and cheered loud [sic] and long, while the ladies, hundreds of whom were present, rose in their seats and waved their   handkerchiefs, participating in and adding to the general excitement and intense interest of the scene.  This lasted for several minutes.

The Congressional Globe, 531 (1865).

Nevada’s constitution has been amended over the years, but remains in effect.  Article 8 includes a number of provisions relating to corporations.  These provisions are discussed in Bishop & Zucker on Nevada Corporations and Limited Liability Companies.

13 Stat. 30Election of 1864H.G. WorthingtonNevada constitutionPresident Abraham LincolnSteven SpielbergThirteenth Amendment
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • Sealing A Contract May Mean Nothing Or 20 Years!
  • Ever Wonder What Money Is? California Has Some Answers And I Have Some Questions
  • Bitcoin And The Corporations Code
  • If You’re Relying On The Signature Of Two Officers, You May Want To Think Again
  • Court Explicates Scope of Usury Exemption For Real Estate Brokers
  • Supreme Court To Decide If It Will Decide Whether Section 16 Plaintiff Has Constitutional Standing
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • JOBS Act
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

November 2012
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Copyright © 2013 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me