• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

The Problem Of The Deceased Incorporator (Part II) And A Greek Remark

By Keith Paul Bishop on September 7, 2012 in Corporate Governance

Yesterday, I wrote about the unfortunate situation of an incorporator dying before the articles of incorporation are filed.  In response, at least two people asked about a different situation.  What do you do when the incorporator dies after the articles are filed and before taking action to appoint directors (assuming that the initial directors are not named in the articles of incorporation)?  Is the corporation doomed to forever inhabit the isthmus of a middle state between incorporation and full organization?

Fortunately, Section 306 of the California Corporations Code provides a solution:

If (a) a corporation has not issued shares and all the directors resign, die, or become incompetent, or (b) a corporation’s initial directors have not been named in the articles, and all the incorporators resign, die, or become incompetent prior to the election of the initial directors, the superior court of any county may appoint directors of the corporation upon application by any party in interest.

This statute previously addressed only the situation described in clause (a).  In 2000, the Business Law Section of the California State Bar sponsored a bill to amend Section 306 to deal with the situation in which no directors have been named in the articles or appointed by a deceased incorporator.  AB 1985 (Ackerman), Stats. 2000, c. 135, § 29.

One issue, of course, may be who constitutes a “party in interest”.  I can provide one clear answer – the Commissioner of Financial Institutions.  Cal. Fin. Code § 1174.

How To Write Like Thucydides (And Not Gilbert)

Writers of law review articles seem to like to refer to ”the οἱ πολλοί” (pronounced the hoi polloi).   “Πολλοί” in Greek simply means the many and by extension, the great unwashed.  “Οἱ” in Greek is the article “the”.  In translation, the expression is redundant because it would be “the the many”.  Nonetheless, many find it hard to say simply “hoi polloi”, but it can be done as demonstrated by Judge Flaum of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals:

“The practical effect of letting judges play art critic and censor would be to enforce conventional notions of “educated taste,” and thus to allow highly educated people to consume erotica but forbid hoi polloi to do the same.”

Miller v. Civil City of South Bend, 904 F.2d 1081, 1098 (7th Cir. 1990).  Perhaps it was intended to be part of the fun, but Sir William S. Gilbert (the librettist half of Gilbert & Sullivan) chose redundancy over literal correctness in Act I of Iolanthe:

PEERS. Our lordly style
You shall not quench
With base canaille!
FAIRIES. (That word is French.)
PEERS.   Distinction ebbs
Before a herd
Of vulgar plebs!
FAIRIES. (A Latin word.)
PEERS.   ’Twould fill with joy,
And madness stark
The οἱ πολλοί!
FAIRIES. (A Greek remark.)
PEERS. One Latin word, one Greek remark,
And one that’s French.
AB 1985deceased incorporatorincorporationSection 306
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • Sealing A Contract May Mean Nothing Or 20 Years!
  • Ever Wonder What Money Is? California Has Some Answers And I Have Some Questions
  • Bitcoin And The Corporations Code
  • If You’re Relying On The Signature Of Two Officers, You May Want To Think Again
  • Court Explicates Scope of Usury Exemption For Real Estate Brokers
  • Supreme Court To Decide If It Will Decide Whether Section 16 Plaintiff Has Constitutional Standing
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • JOBS Act
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

September 2012
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Copyright © 2013 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me