• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

When Asking For Spousal Consent Is Unlawful

By Keith Paul Bishop on May 3, 2012 in Broker-Dealers, California Securities Laws

From time to time, a question will arise about the necessity of obtaining spousal consent in connection with the purchase or sale of a security.  Interestingly, California declares it unlawful for any agent or broker-dealer to require prior spousal consent or authorization as a condition to the purchase or sale of securities in the name of a married person.  Corporations Code Section 25246.

The General Corporation Law also provides that domestic or  foreign corporations (and their transfer agents and registrars) are not  liable to any married person or to any transferee of that person for transferring shares or other securities on their books at the instance of the person in whose name they are registered, without the signature of that person’s spouse and regardless of whether the registration indicates that the shares or other securities are community property, in the same manner as if the person were unmarried.  Corporations Code Section 420(c).

Delaware/California Law Update

On May 22, I’ll be participating in the Los Angeles County Bar Association’s annual Delaware/California Law Update Symposium.  California Corporations Commissioner Jan Owen will be the luncheon keynote speaker and prominent Delaware lawyer Mark Gentile will be providing the Delaware law update.

This annual symposium is a longstanding tradition of the Los Angeles County Bar Association.  It is also known as the Glendon Tremaine Symposium in honor of the former president of the association who passed away in 1986 at the age of 82.

 

Glendon TremaineSection 25246Section 420(c)spousal consent
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • If You’re Relying On The Signature Of Two Officers, You May Want To Think Again
  • Court Explicates Scope of Usury Exemption For Real Estate Brokers
  • Supreme Court To Decide If It Will Decide Whether Section 16 Plaintiff Has Constitutional Standing
  • But Wait, California May Require Even More In Annual Reports To Shareholders
  • California Requires Many Foreign Corporations To Send Annual Financial Statements To Shareholders
  • The Salon Sub Rosa And Nevada Corporate Law
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • JOBS Act
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Copyright © 2013 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me