• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

The SEC’s Form 10-K: “In Endless Error Hurled”

By Keith Paul Bishop on April 11, 2012 in Uncategorized

In February, I wrote that I had noticed several errors in the PDF version of the Form 10-K posted on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website.  Here’s what I found:

  • In General Instruction G(4), there is a reference to Rule 12b-23(e).  There is no paragraph (e) to Rule 12b-23.
  • The same instruction refers to “17 CFR 240.12b(e)” even though no such section exists.
  •  In Part III, there is an inconsistency in whether the caption should be “Principal Accounting Fees and Services” or Principal Accountant Fees and Services”.  
  • In Instruction J(1)(e),  Item 4 is incorrectly identified as “Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders” rather than “Mine Safety Disclosures”.
  • Under the caption “Supplemental Information to be Furnished With Reports Filed Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act by Registrants Which Have Not Registered Securities Pursuant to Section 12 of the Act”, there is a reference to Rule 12b-23(d), which also does not exist.  
  • Finally, it is puzzling that the SEC has never bothered to update Instruction D which obviously predates electronic filing. 

Admittedly, none of these errors is particularly earthshaking and we are all “reasoning but to err”, but it is nonetheless suprising to see so many mistakes in one of the principal periodic reporting forms published by the SEC.

Form 10-K
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • Ever Wonder What Money Is? California Has Some Answers And I Have Some Questions
  • Bitcoin And The Corporations Code
  • If You’re Relying On The Signature Of Two Officers, You May Want To Think Again
  • Court Explicates Scope of Usury Exemption For Real Estate Brokers
  • Supreme Court To Decide If It Will Decide Whether Section 16 Plaintiff Has Constitutional Standing
  • But Wait, California May Require Even More In Annual Reports To Shareholders
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • JOBS Act
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

April 2012
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Copyright © 2013 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me