• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

Ban On Corporate And Union Contributions To Candidates Qualified For The November Ballot

By Keith Paul Bishop on March 7, 2012 in Corporate Governance, Legislation

In December, California Secretary of State Debra Bowen announced that she has certified the first initiative for the November 6, 2012, presidential election ballot.  Among other things, this initiative would ban corporations, labor unions and public employee labor unions from making contributions to any candidate, candidate controlled committee, or any other committee including a political party committee, if those funds will be used to make contributions to any candidate or candidate controlled committee.  The initiative defines “corporation” as “every corporation organized under the laws of this state, or any other state of the United States, or the District of Columbia, or under an act of the Congress of the United States.”  

Chief Justice Rose Bird’s Last Legacy?

The initiative is the first ballot measure to qualify pursuant to SB 202, Chapter 558, Statutes of 2011.  That legislation requires that all ballot measures approved after July 1, 2011, only appear on November general election ballots.  Beginning in 1972, the Secretary of State has placed qualified initiative measures on the ballot for primary elections.   Chief Justice Rose Bird in her dissent from Brosnahan v. Eu,  31 Cal.3d 1 (1982) questioned the constitutionality of this procedure:

An additional issue, not raised by the parties here, apparently has never been resolved by this court.  The Constitution requires that initiative and referendum measures be submitted to the voters “at the next general election ” after the measures qualify, or at a special election called by the Governor.  (Cal. Const., art. II, § 8, subd. (c) and § 9, subd. (c), italics added.)  The Elections Code defines a general election as “the election held throughout the state on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November in each even-numbered year.” ( Elec. Code, § 20.)   A special election is an election the timing of which is not otherwise prescribed by law. ( Elec. Code, § 27.)  The election scheduled for June of 1982 is a regularly scheduled “direct primary” (see Elec. Code, § 23)–not a special election or a general election.  Thus, the constitutionality of submitting an initiative to the voters at a June primary election would appear to be an open question.

Thereafter, the legislature amended the definition of “general election”.  AB 1466 (Statham) Chapter 405, Statutes of 1993.  Last year’s bill to limit initiative measures to the November ballot was supported by two labor organizations and opposed by several business and trade associations.

31 Cal.3d 1Brosnahan v. Euinitiative measuresJustice Rose BirdPolitical expenditure banSB 202
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • Ever Wonder What Money Is? California Has Some Answers And I Have Some Questions
  • Bitcoin And The Corporations Code
  • If You’re Relying On The Signature Of Two Officers, You May Want To Think Again
  • Court Explicates Scope of Usury Exemption For Real Estate Brokers
  • Supreme Court To Decide If It Will Decide Whether Section 16 Plaintiff Has Constitutional Standing
  • But Wait, California May Require Even More In Annual Reports To Shareholders
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • JOBS Act
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

March 2012
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Copyright © 2013 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me