• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

Forming A Benefit Or Flexible Purpose Corporation? Some Pitfalls To Avoid

By Keith Paul Bishop on February 13, 2012 in Corporate Governance

In previous blogs, I’ve noted the appearance of two new types of California corporations – the flexible purpose corporation and the benefit corporation.  Because the laws creating both of these forms took effect on January 1, organizers have been forced to draft on a tabula rasa.  Here are a few drafting pitfalls that have come to my attention.

Benefit Corporations

Section 14602 of the Corporations Code requires that the articles of incorporation must state that “the corporation is a benefit corporation” and must identify “any specific public benefit adopted pursuant to Section 14610″.  Some incorporators may conclude that this is all that is required.  However, the articles must also include the general purpose statement required of all corporations pursuant to Section 202(b).

Confusingly, the articles should not include a statement that the corporation has the purpose of “creating general public benefit” even though Section 14610(a) requires that all benefit corporations have that purpose.  The reason is that Section 202(b) provides that the articles of incorporation may not set forth any further or additional statement with respect to the purposes or powers of a corporation except by way of limitation or as expressly required by California law (other than the General Corporation Law) or any other statute or regulation.

Flexible Purpose Corporations

The name of a flexible purpose corporation must include the words “flexible purpose corporation” or an abbreviation of those words (such as “FCP”).  The articles must include a statement that the corporation “is organized as a flexible purpose corporation under the Corporate Flexibility Act of 2011″.

These aren’t all of the rules pertaining to either entity.  If you happen to run into other issues or problems incorporating under either law, please let me know.

10 CCR Section 260.231Benefit CorporationFlexible Purpose CorporationSection 14602Section 202(b)
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • If You’re Relying On The Signature Of Two Officers, You May Want To Think Again
  • Court Explicates Scope of Usury Exemption For Real Estate Brokers
  • Supreme Court To Decide If It Will Decide Whether Section 16 Plaintiff Has Constitutional Standing
  • But Wait, California May Require Even More In Annual Reports To Shareholders
  • California Requires Many Foreign Corporations To Send Annual Financial Statements To Shareholders
  • The Salon Sub Rosa And Nevada Corporate Law
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • JOBS Act
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Copyright © 2013 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me