• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

Bill Proclaims Intention To Require Reporting Of Compensation By Publicly Traded Corporations

By Keith Paul Bishop on February 29, 2012 in Legislation, Secretary of State

In 2002, the California legislature enacted the Corporate Disclosure Act to require publicly traded corporations and publicly traded foreign corporations qualified to transact intrastate business in California to file a statement of information with the California Secretary of State.  Cal. Corp. Code §§ 1502.1 & 2117.1.  For additional background on the CDA, see my article, California Joins the Parade: The California Disclosure Act, 16 Insights 21 (2002).

The Secretary of State has implemented an on-line search tool that allows the public to search and view these filings.  Unfortunately, the information provided is a poor substitute for the information that these companies include in their filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Thus, the public is more likely to be misled than informed by the these California filings. 

Rather than repeal this duplicative and decidedly unhelpful requirement, Senator Mark Leno has introduced legislation that signals an intent to expand it.  Currently, SB 1208, consists of only of the following section:

 SECTION 1.  It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would require publicly traded corporations to report to the Secretary of State all forms of compensation, including pensions and benefits from other types of employee benefit plans, to the five most highly compensated retired executive officers of the corporation.

 It  will be interesting to see what path this intention paves. 

 

 

 

California Corporate Disclosure Actsb 1208section 1502.1Section 2117.1
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • Bitcoin And The Corporations Code
  • If You’re Relying On The Signature Of Two Officers, You May Want To Think Again
  • Court Explicates Scope of Usury Exemption For Real Estate Brokers
  • Supreme Court To Decide If It Will Decide Whether Section 16 Plaintiff Has Constitutional Standing
  • But Wait, California May Require Even More In Annual Reports To Shareholders
  • California Requires Many Foreign Corporations To Send Annual Financial Statements To Shareholders
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • JOBS Act
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Copyright © 2013 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me