• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

11/11/11 Was A Record Day For Section 25102(f) Filings!

By Keith Paul Bishop on February 3, 2012 in California Securities Laws

I’ve previously written about California’s on-line database for securities filings which is known as Cal-EASI (See “California’s Big EASI“).  Recently, I noticed what is very likely to be a record busting day for Section 25102(f) filings.

On November 11, 2011, one issuer filed a total of 20 notices disclosing an astonishing aggregate transaction value of $1,686,187,868.50!  The issuer reported that the total money value for these transactions was in excess of $1.5 billion and the value of other consideration exceeded $185 million.*  One notice alone disclosed a total transaction value in money of just under $1 billion.  I haven’t checked the record books, but this notice may well be the largest transaction value ever reported to the Department of Corporations pursuant to Section 25102(f).

Remarkably, the issuer wasn’t obligated to file many of these notices.  Rule 260.102.14(b) states “No notice is requires if none of the securities are purchased in this state.”   This statement is also repeated in Instruction #2 to the form (Rule 260.102.14(d)).  Thus, I was surprised to see that about half of the notices disclose that no securities were sold or proposed to be sold in California.

The issuer?  Facebook, Inc.

________________________

*Because the issuer left the date of first sale blank on the notice, it isn’t possible to determine when these transactions occurred.  Also, the issuer is required to disclose the value of securities sold or proposed to be sold.  Therefore, the notices do not necessarily disclose the amount of consideration actually received by an issuer.

25102(f) noticeCal-EASInotice of transactionRule 260.102.14Section 25102(f)
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • NASAA And The DOC Warn Investors Of The “Madding Crowd’s Ignoble Strife”
  • Supreme Court Fails To Bite At Bulldog And Oxfam America Sues The SEC
  • It May Be The Hobgoblin Of Little Minds, But California Requires It Nonetheless
  • The Case Of The Board Member Who Didn’t Show Up – Or Did She?
  • Facebook, Inc. And CalEASI
  • Bill Targets Real Estate Industry And Borrowers
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Copyright © 2012 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me