• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

Shareholder Inspection Rights – Another Nevada “Advantage”?

By Keith Paul Bishop on January 30, 2012 in Nevada Corporations, Securities Litigation

Thanks to Kevin LaCroix’s The D&O Diary, I was alerted to a recent article by Boris Feldman, a member of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., in Palo Alto, California discussing developments in class action and other shareholder litigation.  Among other things, Boris notes that litigation under Delaware’s stockholder inspection statute, Section 220, has “caught fire” in the last year.  He attributes this phenomenon to a variety of factors, including the encouragement of the Delaware Court of Chancery.  The article was published in The Review of Securities & Commodities Regulation (Jan. 11, 2012).

While NRS 78.257 grants stockholders the right to inspect the books of account and financial a records, publicly traded Nevada corporations are far less likely to face inspection demands and litigation over denials of access.  NRS 78.257(6) provides that (with one exception) those inspection rights “do not apply to any corporation that furnishes to its stockholders a detailed, annual financial statement or any corporation that has filed during the preceding 12 months all reports required to be filed pursuant to section 13 or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.”

NRS 78.257Section 220stockholder inspection rights
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • NASAA And The DOC Warn Investors Of The “Madding Crowd’s Ignoble Strife”
  • Supreme Court Fails To Bite At Bulldog And Oxfam America Sues The SEC
  • It May Be The Hobgoblin Of Little Minds, But California Requires It Nonetheless
  • The Case Of The Board Member Who Didn’t Show Up – Or Did She?
  • Facebook, Inc. And CalEASI
  • Bill Targets Real Estate Industry And Borrowers
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

January 2012
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Copyright © 2012 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me