• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

California’s Two New Corporate Forms – And The Winner Is . . .

By Keith Paul Bishop on January 10, 2012 in Corporate Governance, Legislation

Recently, Marc Lifsher wrote this story for the Los Angeles Times regarding California’s new “Benefit Corporation Law”.  He reports that “Chief executives, led by Yvon Chouinard, the founder of Patagonia, a 56-year-old seller of outdoor apparel and equipment based in Ventura County, marched into the secretary of state’s office shortly after it opened Tuesday morning.”  So who won the race to be the first California benefit corporation?

I contacted the Secretary of State’s office last week and was told that first place belongs to THE IDEAL WORLD.  I won’t say that this is an honor because I have serious concerns about the benefit corporation legislation.

The bill creating benefit corporations, AB 361 (Huffman) was the product of a disreputable bit of legislative ledgerdemain known as the “spot bill”.   A “spot bill” is a bill that makes a very inconsequential change to a statute and then is later amended.  Spot bills are used as placeholders but they also provide a means to sandbag possible opposition. Authors use them to mask their true plans and limit public scrutiny of a bill.  See “See Spot Run” and “A Leopard Loses His Spots – AB 361 Is Amended“.

Those considering creating or moving to benefit corporation status should understand that a key feature of AB 361 is the concept of a third party standard for defining, reporting, and assessing overall corporate social and environmental performance of the benefit corporation.  These fees can be as much as $25,000 annually!  Thus, it is no surprise that the source of the legislation was B Lab, an organization that provides certification services.

Fortunately, there is a much better alternative to the benefit corporation form – the flexible purpose corporation.  In marked contrast to AB 361, the proponents of this legislation were careful to solicit input and to expose their ideas to public comment.  SB 201 (DeSaulnier) was the handiwork of a working group of lawyers who worked for over a year to write a new division to the California Corporations Code.

According to the Secretary of State’s office, the first flexible purpose corporation is PROMETHEUS CIVIC TECHNOLOGIES, FPC.

In February, I will be joining Professor C. Hugh Friedman (University of San Diego), Jim Fotenos (Green Radovsky Maloney Share Hennigh LLP), Susan Mac Cormac (Morrison & Foerster LLP) and John Montgomery (Montgomery & Hansen LLP) in presentations in Los Angeles and San Francisco on both flexible purpose and benefit corporations.  Information about these programs is available here.

AB 361B Labbenefit corporationsflexible purpose corporationsSB 201Spot bill
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • If You’re Relying On The Signature Of Two Officers, You May Want To Think Again
  • Court Explicates Scope of Usury Exemption For Real Estate Brokers
  • Supreme Court To Decide If It Will Decide Whether Section 16 Plaintiff Has Constitutional Standing
  • But Wait, California May Require Even More In Annual Reports To Shareholders
  • California Requires Many Foreign Corporations To Send Annual Financial Statements To Shareholders
  • The Salon Sub Rosa And Nevada Corporate Law
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • JOBS Act
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

January 2012
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Copyright © 2013 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me