• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

Governor Brown Vetoes CalPERS/CalSTRS Gift Limitation Bill

By Keith Paul Bishop on October 10, 2011 in CalPERS/CalSTRS

For the last two years, the California Public Employees Retirement System has been dogged by an unrelenting stream of bad news concerning the behavior of its current and former board members and officers.  In the most recent blow, the California Fair Political Practices Commission issued this press release in September announcing that it had fined 17 officials at CalPERS for failing to report gifts as required by state law.  Among those fined was Rob Feckner, President of the CalPERS Board of Administration.

In an effort to address a rising tide of ethical concerns, CalPERS commissioned a law firm to conduct a “special review” of outside placement agent activities.  According to this story by Marc Lifsher at the Los Angeles Times, the review cost CalPERS $11 million and culminated in a 56 page report (or just under $200,000 per page). Remarkably, CalPERS chose to use a firm that according to Brad Pacheco, Chief of CalPERS’ Office of Public Affairs, had “previously represented CalPERS in different proceedings and matters”.  Nonetheless, the report included this observation:

During the course of our investigation, we learned that external money managers and others, including placement agents, paid for expensive meals and provided substantial gifts to CalPERS staff and Board members. Some of these meals and gifts were not reported on the required forms. We also learned that, until 2008, external managers made and paid for extraordinary travel arrangements, including air travel by private jet, for various CalPERS staff and Board members. This travel was not reported on the required gift forms, in some cases because it was provided pursuant to clauses in agreements between CalPERS and its investment managers which specified that their investment partnerships were to pay for those trips. Gifts, meals and travel of this kind may create potential fitness issues and conflicts of interest, or at least the appearance of them, and suggest that decisions could be made for reasons other than the merits of a particular investment. No gift, meal or trip is worth compromising the integrity of the CalPERS investment process, or creating an appearance that it has been compromised.

In response, Senator Gloria Negrete McLeod introduced SB 439 to prohibit any member of the board of, and any designated employee of, CalPERS or the State Teachers’ Retirement System from accepting gifts in any calendar year with a total value of more than $50 from any single person who has secured a contract with, or submitted a contract proposal to, CalPERS or CalSTRS within the previous five years.

Although the bill passed both houses of the legislature without a single no vote and was supported by CalPERS, Governor Brown vetoed the bill last week. According to his veto message, the Governor objected to the creation of special rules under the Political Reform Act for the two retirement systems.

CalPERS finesCalPERs Special ReviewFair political practices commissionpay-to-playSB 439
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • Court Holds Non-Parties May Enforce Arbitration Agreement Even Though The General Rule Is That They Can’t
  • Two Very Good Reasons To Visit The Department’s Website
  • Sealing A Contract May Mean Nothing Or 20 Years!
  • Ever Wonder What Money Is? California Has Some Answers And I Have Some Questions
  • Bitcoin And The Corporations Code
  • If You’re Relying On The Signature Of Two Officers, You May Want To Think Again
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • JOBS Act
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

October 2011
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Copyright © 2013 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me