• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

The Commissioner’s Precedent Decisions – Another Route To Rulemaking?

By Keith Paul Bishop on January 11, 2011 in California Securities Laws, Department of Corporations

The Commissioner of Corporations may issue desist and refrain orders under the Corporate Securities Law of 1968.  Cal. Corp. Code § 25532.  If the respondent wishes to contest the order, s/he must do so by filing a request for hearing within 30 days of service of the D&R order. A hearing must then be held under the formal adjudication provisions of the California Administrative Procedure Act.  An Administrative Law Judge will then issue a proposed decision that the Commissioner may or may not adopt.

To what extent, can the Commissioner rely on adopted decisions as precedent in subsequent hearings?  The legislature amended the APA in 1995 to permit the Commissioner (and other state agencies) to designate ALJ decisions as precedent decisions.  Cal. Govt. Code § 11425.60(a).  The Commissioner, moreover, is prohibited from relying on a decision as precedent unless that decision has been designated as a precedent decision.  Cal. Govt. Code § 11425.60(b). 

Interestingly, the legislature has expressly provided that designation of a decision as a precedent decision is not rulemaking subject to the notice, comment and review provisions of the APA.  Further, the decision to designate a decision is not subject to judicial review.  Thus, precedent decisions can represent an end-run on the rulemaking provisions of the APA.

Commissioners have used this authority relatively sparingly.  Only eight decisions have been designated and only three of the designated decisions involve the CSL.  Copies of the Commissioner’s precedent decisions are available on the Department of Corporations’ website.

Administrative Procedure ActAPACommissioner of CorporationsCorporate Securities LawCSLprecedent decision
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • If You’re Relying On The Signature Of Two Officers, You May Want To Think Again
  • Court Explicates Scope of Usury Exemption For Real Estate Brokers
  • Supreme Court To Decide If It Will Decide Whether Section 16 Plaintiff Has Constitutional Standing
  • But Wait, California May Require Even More In Annual Reports To Shareholders
  • California Requires Many Foreign Corporations To Send Annual Financial Statements To Shareholders
  • The Salon Sub Rosa And Nevada Corporate Law
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • JOBS Act
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

January 2011
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Copyright © 2013 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me