• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

“License? We Don’t Need No Stinking License”

By Keith Paul Bishop on October 6, 2010 in Department of Corporations, Finance Lenders

The Department of Corporations’ jurisdiction is not limited to the Corporate Securities Law of 1968.  In fact, it has an entire division dedicated to financial services regulation.  The Department’s Financial Services Division, or FSD, has responsibililty for administering the following six laws:  

  • California Deferred Deposit Transaction Law
  • California Finance Lenders Law
  • California Foreclosure Prevention Act
  • California Residential Mortgage Lending Act
  • Check Sellers, Bill Payers and Proraters Law
  • Escrow Law

In my day, the FSD also regulated state chartered credit unions.  This responsibility now resides in the Department of Financial Institutions. 

The California Finance Lenders Law, Cal. Corp. Code § 22000 et seq., has the largest number of licensees (over 2,200) and yet the law is often overlooked.  Generally, the CFL requires any one who is engaged in the business of making either consumer or commercial loans to be licensed as finance lender, unless they are exempt.  

One benefit of obtaining a CFL license is that licensees constitute a class of exempt lenders for purposes of California’s Constitutional limitations on interest rates.  Cal. Const. Art. XV, § 1.  In an upcoming post, I plan to discuss a recent Court of Appeal decision that examines the scope of that usury exemption.

CFLusury
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • If You’re Relying On The Signature Of Two Officers, You May Want To Think Again
  • Court Explicates Scope of Usury Exemption For Real Estate Brokers
  • Supreme Court To Decide If It Will Decide Whether Section 16 Plaintiff Has Constitutional Standing
  • But Wait, California May Require Even More In Annual Reports To Shareholders
  • California Requires Many Foreign Corporations To Send Annual Financial Statements To Shareholders
  • The Salon Sub Rosa And Nevada Corporate Law
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • JOBS Act
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

October 2010
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Copyright © 2013 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me