• HOME
  • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • PROFILE
  • ALLEN MATKINS
  • CONTACT
Print Email Shortlink

Proxy Access and Majority Voting

By Keith Paul Bishop on September 17, 2010 in CalPERS/CalSTRS, Corporate Governance

According to TheCorporateCounsel.net yesterday, the Security and Exchange Commission’s proxy access rules were published yesterday in the Federal Register – thereby starting the clock on the effectiveness of the rules.

In complying with proxy access, California companies should think about the interplay between Corporations Code § 708.5  and proxy access.   Section 708.5 was added to the Code a few years ago at the behest of the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) and the State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS).  The statute allows a listed corporation that has eliminated cumulative voting to amend either its articles or bylaws to provide that in an uncontested election, “approval of the shareholders” (defined in Cal. Corp. Code  § 153) is required to elect a director.   An “uncontested election” is defined as an election in which the number of candidates does not exceed the number of directors to be elected (note that statute makes specific provision for when this determination is to be made). 

Proxy access may result in fewer “uncontested elections” and thus have the likely unintended consequence of vitiating majority vote requirements for the election of directors.

708.5California Public Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia State Teachers Retirement SystemCalPERSCalSTRSmajority vote requirementproxy accessSecurities and Exchange Commission
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • Court Holds Non-Parties May Enforce Arbitration Agreement Even Though The General Rule Is That They Can’t
  • Two Very Good Reasons To Visit The Department’s Website
  • Sealing A Contract May Mean Nothing Or 20 Years!
  • Ever Wonder What Money Is? California Has Some Answers And I Have Some Questions
  • Bitcoin And The Corporations Code
  • If You’re Relying On The Signature Of Two Officers, You May Want To Think Again
  • Conflict Minerals Bill In Suspense File (For Now)
  • Concurrent Jurisdiction Found For Covered Class Actions
  • Nevada Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Approach To Fair Value Burden Of Proof
  • SEC Proposes John Wilkes Booth Rules
  • If I Were A Carpenter, I’d Build A Better Proxy
  • CalPERS’ Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?
← Previous Next →

AUTHOR

Keith Paul Bishop
Partner
(949) 553-1313
kbishop@allenmatkins.com
CONTACT ME

RECOGNITION

NEWSLETTER

TOPICS

  • Accountants
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product
  • Broker-Dealers
  • California Securities Laws
  • California Sui Generis
  • CalPERS/CalSTRS
  • Choice of Law/Conflict of Law
  • Corporate Governance
  • Department of Corporations
  • Derivative Suits
  • Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fairness Hearings
  • Finance Lenders
  • Financial Institutions
  • Investment Advisers
  • JOBS Act
  • Legislation
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Nevada Corporations
  • Non-Compete Agreements
  • Partnerships
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Pseudo-Foreign Corporations
  • Public Records Act/FOIA
  • Secretary of State
  • Securities Litigation
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

YOUTUBE

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

CALENDAR

September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Copyright © 2013 California Corporate & Securities Law.

Powered by WordPress and News.

  • follow:follow:
  • Become my Facebook friend Become my Facebook friend
  • Connect with me Connect with me
  • RSS RSS
  • Tweet with me Tweet with me